moon over Dublin, 2
04-09-2008
name: Baloonik, 04-09-2008 21:36
Creepy.
name: Jeremy, 05-09-2008 8:13
Questionable play of moonlight and shadow hanging over a heavy builiding gave priority to the technical side of this shot, completely losing the feeling of the power of nature. Bad picture.
name: Philip, 05-09-2008 8:45
Bad picture? I'd rather say - very bad, pathetic picture! Play of moonlight and shadows, mentioned by Jeremy, is pity, even with the big, straight post separating two parts of this picture. I'm depressed.
name: Jeremy, 05-09-2008 11:00
Now, when you've said that, I realize - good photographers take a picture of a moon and what you see is the whole Universe. But here! It constitutes a mere addition to the overweight block on the far right and the anorectic lamp post in the middle. Ouch!
name: Philip, 05-09-2008 11:10
You' re absolutely right! But we may look at this "picture" from the other way - one part of it is very dark (eg. the sky, the building) and the other is just dark (everything else except the moon and the windows). This is not a picture - its a Big Mistake!
name: Jeremy, 05-09-2008 11:25
By using the word "dark", Philip, you're adding to this picture a meaning that is not existing in it - one would call it an artificial reality. I'd rather say - potentially interesting situation unfortunatelly caught on the way to the center of artistic unknown.
name: jedrzej, 05-09-2008 11:51
yeeah! :)
name: beanow, 05-09-2008 20:19
łomatko, ale dyskusja!
:)))
name: dennis, 25-03-2010 12:06
Good and bad designations are subjective. So are descriptors such as depressing and "big mistake". I find the photo interesting, and I like it. I challenge the critics, Jeremy and Phillip, to leave a website address where we can see what they have done.